Mergers and acquisitions

We advise companies, business owners, investors and industrial and financial groups on mergers and acquisitions (M&A), on the sale and purchase of companies, shares, quotas —the “participaciones” of a Spanish limited company—, assets and business units, and on strategic alliances and joint venture transactions. More than 150 transactions have taught us that a deal is not measured solely by reaching signature. The aim is to complete a transaction that is legally sound, economically coherent and capable of meeting, after completion, the expectations that led the client to contemplate it.

We understand each transaction as a strategic process and not as a mere succession of legal documents. Before the transaction is structured it is necessary to understand the business, to identify the client's objectives, to detect the risks and to anticipate the matters capable of determining whether the transaction succeeds. That way of working allows us to accompany the client from beginning to end with an overall view and direct dialogue with the lawyers handling the matter.

Strategy and preparation of the transaction

A well-structured transaction begins long before the sale and purchase agreement is signed. At the initial stage we analyse with the client the economic purpose of the transaction, the most appropriate legal structure, the foreseeable risks and the conditions that will have to be satisfied in order to achieve the result sought. We advise both buyers and sellers on the preparation and organisation of the process. This work covers the negotiation of letters of intent, offers, confidentiality and exclusivity agreements and other preliminary documents, the definition of the perimeter of the transaction, the preliminary corporate steps and the analysis of the legal, tax, regulatory and competition implications that may prove relevant.

Where the matter is a sale process, we are also involved in organising it legally, including competitive or auction procedures. We prepare the company and the documentation needed to approach the transaction with the greatest possible certainty and efficiency. Our knowledge of commercial and company law and of property and contract law takes on particular importance at this stage. Acquiring a company or a business necessarily entails analysing corporate, contractual, proprietary and security relationships, a proper understanding of which may prove decisive in structuring the transaction and protecting the client's interests.

Due diligence

Due diligence is one of the essential stages of any M&A transaction. Its purpose is not merely to identify contingencies, but to assess their real significance for the transaction and to determine how they are to be reflected in the structure, the price, the guarantees or the terms of the contract.

In purchase transactions we analyse the legal position of the company, the business or the assets being acquired, with particular regard to its corporate structure, relevant contracts, assets, financing, guarantees, litigation, contingencies and any other matters capable of affecting the decision to invest or the terms of the transaction.

In sale processes we advise the client on the preparation of the information and on the prior identification of the matters the buyer may examine, which makes for orderly management of the process and allows possible obstacles to the transaction to be anticipated.

Our aim is for the legal review to give the client information that is useful for taking a decision. Due diligence must make it possible to distinguish between a merely formal contingency and a risk genuinely capable of affecting the value, the structure or the viability of the transaction.

Negotiation and formalisation

Once the structure of the transaction has been defined and the review stage completed, we take part in negotiating and drafting the agreement for the sale and purchase of shares, quotas, assets or the business —the Share Purchase Agreement or SPA, where appropriate— and the remaining documentation needed for its formalisation.

We pay particular attention to the clauses that determine how risk is allocated between the parties, such as those on price and adjustment mechanisms, representations and warranties, indemnities, limitations on liability, conditions precedent, payment guarantees, pre-completion and post-completion obligations and dispute resolution.

Where the continued presence of different shareholders after the transaction so requires, we negotiate and draft shareholders' agreements intended to regulate the governance of the company, majorities, economic rights, the transfer of quotas, exit mechanisms and the arrangements for preventing and resolving deadlock situations.

Completion and subsequent steps

Our work does not end at signature. We work alongside the client in satisfying the conditions required for completion, in implementing the corporate resolutions, in formalising guarantees and in carrying out the steps arising from the transaction. After completion, we continue to advise on the performance of the obligations assumed by the parties, on the corporate matters connected with the new structure and on any issues that may arise during the integration stage or in the performance of the agreements reached.

This continuity is particularly valuable where we already know the company and the economic rationale of the transaction, because it makes it possible to respond quickly and to maintain consistency between what was negotiated, what was formalised and how it is subsequently applied.

International transactions

Our experience comprises more than 150 transactions carried out in Spain or with an international component. The latter have involved companies, investors or assets located in Europe, Asia, the Middle East, the Americas, Africa and Oceania. We have taken part, among others, in transactions connected with India, China and Hong Kong, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Turkey, France, the United Kingdom, Germany, Portugal, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Austria, the United States, Canada, Mexico, Morocco and Australia.

International transactions call for a particular capacity for coordination. The coexistence of different jurisdictions, business cultures, timetables and advisers makes it necessary to maintain an overall view of the transaction and, at the same time, to keep precise control of each of its stages.

We also maintain lasting relationships with professionals specialising in the non-legal aspects of transactions, including financial and technology advisers and suppliers of tools for the secure management of information and of review processes.

Publications

Multiple-vote shares: when economic interest and control of the company cease to coincide

Recent developments in European company law show a growing openness towards capital structures that make it possible to attach different voting rights to shares carrying an equivalent economic interest. Multiple-vote shares, alongside other techniques such as non-voting shares, restrictions on voting rights, shares carrying a right of veto or loyalty shares, make it possible to decouple economic ownership from corporate control. The business problem that these structures seek to solve is clear: to offer founders or core shareholders the possibility of raising capital on the markets without immediately losing control of strategic decisions. At the same time, they raise delicate questions about their limits, the protection of the remaining shareholders and the broader debate as to how far capital and power must necessarily remain linked.

Read more

An acquisition may require several regulatory controls before it can be closed

One and the same acquisition may be subject simultaneously to several public controls before it can be closed. Beyond the agreement between buyer and seller, certain transactions must clear merger control, the foreign investment regime and, where applicable, the new control of foreign subsidies distorting the internal market. These are not alternative regimes, but cumulative ones with different rationales. The practical result is that a sale and purchase may be perfectly agreed between the parties and yet be incapable of being completed until certain authorisations have been obtained or the corresponding regulatory procedures have concluded. Integrating these controls into the contractual structure from the outset is essential in order to manage timetables, risks and, ultimately, the viability of the transaction itself.

Read more

What a due diligence should really uncover before buying a company

Due diligence in the sale and purchase of a company should not be conceived as a mere accumulation of documents and findings, but as a decision-making instrument. Its function is to identify which risks may alter the price, shape the structure of the transaction or even make it inadvisable. The value of the exercise does not lie in detecting the greatest possible number of issues, but in distinguishing which of them are material to the transaction and in translating them into specific decisions on the structure of the sale and purchase, the conditions precedent, the representations and warranties, the indemnities and the price retentions. A truly useful due diligence is one that connects the technical analysis with the drafting of the contract.

Read more

Buying a company in Spain as a foreign investor: when the transaction requires administrative authorisation

Not every acquisition of a company in Spain can be treated as a purely private transaction between buyer and seller. The investor's identity, its country of residence or of beneficial ownership, the target company's sector of activity, the nature of the assets acquired and the degree of control sought may trigger mechanisms for the supervision and prior authorisation of foreign investment. The “Ley 19/2003 sobre movimientos de capitales” —Law 19/2003 on capital movements— and its implementing regulations, together with specific sector-based regimes, have built a system in which certain foreign direct investments are subject to suspension of the liberalisation regime and to administrative authorisation. Identifying this issue at the initial stage of the transaction is essential, because it may determine the signing, the closing, the conditions precedent and the parties' cooperation obligations.

Read more

How merger control is changing and what it may mean for an M&A transaction

Merger control has ceased to be an almost mechanical exercise in comparing market shares and has become a far more sophisticated analysis of how a transaction may alter future competition. Competition law still starts from turnover and market-share thresholds, but the authorities have widened their focus to matters such as potential competition, innovation, access to strategic assets, effects on related markets and the capacity of an acquisition to modify the competitive structure in the medium and long term. For buyers and sellers, identifying competition risk at an early stage is no longer a formality: it may determine the timetable, the contractual documentation, the allocation of risk and, ultimately, the very viability of the transaction.

Read more

Selling the business before its value is destroyed: transfers of business units in situations of insolvency

A company's insolvency does not necessarily mean that its business has no value. An activity may be economically viable and yet be trapped in a financial structure that can no longer sustain it. Spanish insolvency law has evolved precisely in order to allow the business, in such cases, to be separated from the insolvent company and transferred as a business unit to a third party, preserving assets, contracts, activity and, where possible, jobs. The key lies in acting far enough in advance: the longer the financial deterioration continues, the more the value that could have been transferred is destroyed.

Read more

Majorities, vetoes and deadlock situations: how to allocate power among the shareholders without paralysing the company

The allocation of power in a company limited by shares is not exhausted by the percentage of capital held by each shareholder. The design of enhanced majorities, reserved matters and veto rights, the composition of the management body and the mechanisms for resolving deadlock decisively determine who really holds sway and how decisions are taken. The practical challenge lies in giving reasonable protection to majority and minority shareholders without building an architecture that makes it impossible to adopt resolutions when disagreements arise. Company law offers a flexible framework, but it also imposes limits in order to prevent abuse by the majority and by the minority and to safeguard the functioning of the legal person.

Read more

The price of a company cannot always be fixed at signing: locked box, completion accounts and earn-outs

In the sale and purchase of companies, the price is rarely a static figure fixed once and for all at the moment of signing. The initial financial valuation, based on assumptions as to debt, cash, working capital and results, does not always match the amount that the buyer must ultimately pay. To manage this uncertainty, practice uses various contractual mechanisms for determining and adjusting the price, chief among them locked box structures, adjustments by means of completion accounts and earn-outs. What is apparently a financial question becomes a central part of the contractual architecture of the transaction, with direct implications for the allocation of risk, for the definition of economic concepts and for the potential for subsequent litigation.

Read more
See all related publications

The team on this area